The Left of Boom Framework

“Left of boom” is a military phrase for the period before an incident, when you can still prepare and avert a crisis. Our name and our practice rest on one idea: the work done before a crisis determines how well an organisation performs during one. Three connected models bring it to life, the boom line, the capability maturity model, and the eleven elements of crisis management.

Left of Boom vs Right of Boom

Left of Boom vs Right of Boom: before the incident, left of boom covers Purpose, Pre-empt and Prepare; after the incident, right of boom covers Respond, Reassure and Recover.

Left of boom: preparation

Everything before the incident: understanding your people, environment and stakeholders, then building plans, training teams and rehearsing the decisions that matter most. This is where risk is reduced and confidence is built.

Right of boom: response and recovery

Everything after the incident: activating the plan, leading under pressure, communicating with stakeholders and adapting as it develops, through to recovery and the lessons that follow.

Most organisations invest heavily to the right of boom and far less to the left, yet the left is where preparation quietly determines the outcome. That is where we concentrate, helping leaders predict, pre-empt, detect and respond to emerging threats with confidence.

The Capability Maturity Model

A way to see where an organisation's crisis capability sits today, and the journey ahead of it.

The Left of Boom capability maturity model: six tiers of crisis management maturity in increasing order, Chaotic, Reactive, Directive, Collaborative, Proactive, and Adaptive at the top.

Six tiers of crisis maturity, from least to most mature: Chaotic, Reactive, Directive, Collaborative, Proactive and Adaptive. The illustration describes what each level looks like in practice.

Its purpose is to make an under-appreciated capability visible. Crisis capability is easy to overlook until the day it is needed, and hard to argue for without a common language. The model gives boards that language.

Placing an organisation on the model lets us track its journey, benchmark it against peers, and make the case for the investment needed to move up. The goal is not perfection at the top, but honest awareness of where you are and a clear path toward greater resilience.

Benchmark your maturity

The Eleven Elements of Crisis Management

The fundamentals of a capable crisis and resilience program. Together, these eleven elements describe what good looks like, and they span both sides of the boom line, from preparation through to response and recovery.

The eleven elements of crisis management, arranged as a wheel spanning left and right of boom

1. Activation Process. Detecting, escalating and standing the team up quickly, at any hour of the day.

2. Team Structure & Process. Clear roles, deputies and decision authority that scale to the size of the event.

3. Stakeholder Engagement & Communication. Knowing your audiences and communicating with them under pressure.

4. Plans. Current, integrated crisis, continuity and communications plans built on your real risk profile.

5. Facilities. A ready place to run a crisis from, primary and alternate, physical or virtual.

6. Equipment. The tools, communications and supplies the team needs, with resilient backups when normal channels fail.

7. Training. Role-based training that keeps the people with a crisis role competent and current.

8. Exercising. Regular exercises that test the arrangements and turn lessons into improvement.

9. Information Sharing Tools. Log-keeping and a shared, common picture of the situation as it unfolds.

10. Leadership. Visible executive commitment, and leaders prepared to decide under uncertainty.

11. Governance, Compliance & Assurance. Clear accountability, standards alignment and assurance over the whole program.

How the models connect

The three models are designed to work together. The boom line is the philosophy, the reminder that the work done before an incident determines the outcome. The eleven elements are the fundamentals of what good looks like, and they span both sides of the boom line, from preparation through to response and recovery.

An organisation's capability across those eleven elements is then assessed to place it on the capability maturity model. In other words, the eleven elements are what we measure, and the maturity model is how we express the result, showing where an organisation sits today and the journey ahead. Assess honestly, benchmark against peers, and invest deliberately to move from reactive toward adaptive.

Trust: the difference between adaptive and chaotic teams

Left of Boom's founder, Grant Chisnall, has found that the difference between organisations that respond well and those that don't is trust, in each other, their team and their processes. That trust isn't built by any single plan; it reflects how well prepared a team is before the crisis begins.

Adaptive teams don't just react. They respond with confidence, work together, and treat the event as a chance to learn and adapt, emerging stronger. Read more on trust and adaptive teams →

Where the framework comes from

The models draw on Grant Chisnall's military background and fifteen-plus years advising executive teams through some of the most significant crisis events in recent Australian and New Zealand corporate history, codified in his book, Boom or Bust: Survive and Thrive During Crisis, and explored further on Crisis Podcast.

Explore Crisis Resources →

Find out where your organisation sits on the maturity model

Assess your capability now